ELPA SPACE

Accountability

Corrections Policy

How ELPA SPACE handles factual errors, material updates, clarifications, reader corrections, and correction visibility.

Corrections should be prompt, specific, and proportional to the error. Material corrections should be reflected in the article update date.

Correction channel https://t.me/elpaspace
Required evidence Page URL, disputed claim, and supporting source or explanation
Minor edits Typos and wording fixes do not change the update date
Material corrections Updated date and editor note when needed
Responsibility Final correction decisions are owned by Pavel Elpa

When ELPA SPACE identifies a factual error, the article should be corrected promptly. Material corrections should be reflected in the update date and, when needed, an editor note.

Clarifications that improve wording without changing the substance of a claim do not require a new publication date. Substantial updates should use dateModified in structured data.

Readers can submit correction requests through the contact channel. A useful correction includes the article URL, the disputed passage, and a reliable source or explanation.

What Counts As A Correction

A correction is required when a factual claim is wrong, materially incomplete, attributed to the wrong source, or likely to mislead a reader about the subject of the article.

A clarification is used when a sentence is technically accurate but unclear, missing context, or too easy to misread.

How To Submit

Send the article URL, exact passage, explanation of the problem, and a reliable source if available. Corrections involving product details, dates, or policy claims should point to a primary source whenever possible.

  • Article URL
  • Exact sentence or claim
  • What is wrong or incomplete
  • Source or evidence supporting the correction

How Corrections Are Shown

If a correction materially changes the meaning of an article, the updated date should change and an editor note may be added. If the change is minor, the page can be fixed without changing the article's freshness signal.

Trust Layer

Who, how, why, and evidence are visible by design.

Who

Every article should show the named author and editor, with author pages explaining background, scope, and accountability.

How

The site discloses the editorial workflow, including where AI assistance can be used and where human verification is required.

Why

ELPA SPACE exists to help readers understand AI infrastructure shifts, not to publish generic pages solely for search traffic.

Evidence

Articles should expose their source trail through visible references and consistent citation fields in structured data.

Transparency Checklist